I am currently writing a little piece for a book on characters in the Gospel of John and my assigned character is Malchus, the servant of the high priest who loses his ear to the sword of Peter in 18:10-11. As always, I am fascinated by how characters are presented and developed in the Gospel of John. Malchus is no exception. Several insights are guiding my reading of the text:
- In John characters with names often represent misunderstanding or opposition to Jesus. (By contrast, anonymous characters are greater models of faith – Jesus’ mother, the Samaritan woman, the Beloved Disicple, etc.)
- Agents are characters who exist almost solely to advance the action of the narrative. These are generally anonymous in John, but Malchus is not.
- Character development in John’s Gospel is almost always accomplished through speech or action rather than direct description, but again this is reversed in the case of Malchus.
Malchus’s name is given, his vocation is provided (servant of the high priest), and his spatial location is explained. In the end, the brief encounter between Malchus and Peter accomplishes at least three things: (1) it continues to highlight Peter’s impetuous nature; (2) it provides the narrator another opportunity for Jesus to express his commitment to the will of the Father (see v. 11); and (3) it re-emphasizes that for Jesus to be “glorified” it will take a journey to the cross rather than a violent uprising.
It’s amazing how much the Gospel of John can accomplish at the literary and theological level with so little material.




Posted by Charles on September 4, 2010 at 12:14 pm
Interesting piece. I have linked to this at my blog.